Stiga Cybershape Carbon which was launched at the beginning of 2022 made a splash with its very unique head shape. Afterwards, ”Cybershape’ became an new blade family by the launching of ‘Cybershape Wood’. And, in the middle of 2023, Stiga added an innovative idea – CWT – to ‘Cybershape’ series. There are times when player wants to change the center of weight of the blade depending on the condition of the day or the environment of the match, but for conventional table tennis blades it hasn’t been possible. But, new ‘CWT’ system developed by Stiga makes it possible by chaiging the button at the end of handle. Instead of conventional logo plate that is usually attached at the end of handle, Stiga provides three replaceable buttons whose weights are 3g, 6g and 9g respectively. The buttons are attached by the magnet at the end of the handle of ‘CWT’ blade. By attaching the button with additional weight, the center of gravity can be pulled down from the end of the head to the handle. ‘Cybershape Carbon CWT’ is the ‘Cybershape Carbon’ with this innovative idea. Except for the addition of ‘CWT’ system, ‘Cybershape Carbon CWT’ is basically identical to original ‘Cybershape Carbon’.


Instead of the metal plate, there is a round groove at the end of the handle, and there is a magnet inside the groove. Player can leave this groove empty, or add a button with additional weight.

The weight buttons are packed in a small box enclosed in the box, and the tool used to remove the buttons is included.

Player can select the additional weight among 3g, 6g and 9g. Or player can leave the groove empty.

Button is easly attached by magnets. Adding weight button increases the total weight of the blade. However, since the weight is added at the end of the handle, the burden on the player’s wrist does not increase. An important feature of the CWT system is that even the heaviest 9g button is not too burdensome.



The convex on the back of the button is the part that sticks to the magnet inside the handle.



If the basic weight of the blade is 86g, the player can choose one of four total weights of 86g, 89g, 92g, and 95g, and the heavier the weight, the lower the center of gravity toward the handle. Since the position of the weight is at thehandle end, even in case the total weight is 95g, on the wrist it feels like the weighs of 86g or less.


Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this website’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to TTGearLab with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Golf clubs manufacturers have been using optional weight on their driver club heads to change the swing weight and swing plane for many years now. This is the first in table tennis implementation though, and it is an excellent way to customize the weight distribution of the table tennis blade to ones likings. I have experiment with drilling a hole at the butt end of one of my table tennis blade and filled the hole with fishing lead weight. I found by adding weight to the handle, I can actually make a heavy blade feels lighter when I swing through it and also hitting reverse backhand using penhold grip easier.
LikeLike
Thank you for comment. As you experienced, the addition of mass at the end of handle makes the feeling lighter. And, actually it reduces the burden at wrist. Some people may think that CWT is just a commercial idea but I don’t agree. CWT system is sufficiently meaningful. 🙂 We can feel the difference.
LikeLike
Hello, I am using a Stiga Carbonado 190 with a Penhold grip and I drilled a hole at the butt end of the handle. I put 8 grams of fishing lead in the hole and have been using this configuration for several months now. I found the balance of the blade is better for reverse backhand, but I felt the blade is swinging a little lighter than without the extra weight because the head felt lighter with the lead in the butt end of the handle.
Have you measure the performance index of the Cyber Shape Carbon with 0, 3, 6 and 9 grams of weight? Does the Ep and Ec of these four configurations have any measurable differences?
I just felt the Carbonado 190 has more power in its original weight than the extra lead at the handle. Hope you can confirm my experience.
LikeLike
With current measurement system, it is difficult to check the change due to the additional weight at the end of handle. However, the Ep and the Ec should not change because those are the fundamental elasticity of the blade itself. Of course the actual power of blade can change by additional weight because of the change of the weight balance. However, the change of power isn’t due to the change of elasticity. The additional weight at the end of handle acts as a counter-weight that will reduce the power of the blade. The blade becomes heavier but less powerful (not less elastic). In fact, better weight balance means less power if the weight of the head is fixed.
The idea of CWT is for changing the weight balance. And, Stiga isn’t explaining that the additional weigh will increase the power of blade.
LikeLike
Hello,
Please let me know the composition of Truls blade.
Thanks.
LikeLike
Yes. (Dyed) Koto / Ayous / Carbon Fiber / Kiri.
Except for the black dying of top layer, the construction is same as that of Inspira CCF.
LikeLike