Note : All values are average values, and can be updated by further measurement.
DHS & Donic / Outer
| Name | Avg.Wt (g) | Ep | Ec | Ec/Ep | Vp | Vl | Vl/Vp |
| DHS 506A | 87.6 | 1.99 | 1.68 | 0.84 | 1.24 | 1.37 | 1.10 |
| DHS 506X | 85.2 | 2.03 | 1.82 | 0.90 | 1.31 | 1.39 | 1.06 |
| Donic Skachkov Carbon | 82.5 | 1.80 | 1.67 | 0.93 | 1.28 | 1.38 | 1.07 |
| Donic Zhang Jike New Era | 84.4 | 2.23 | 2.05 | 0.92 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 1.07 |
| Donic Zhang Jike Original Carbon | 85.8 | 2.31 | 2.03 | 0.88 | 1.37 | 1.46 | 1.06 |
| Donic Whiper Outer Carbon | 84.1 | 2.03 | 1.97 | 0.97 | 1.37 | 1.36 | 0.99 |
DHS & Donic & Joola / Inner
| Name | Avg.Wt (g) | Ep | Ec | Ec/Ep | Vp | Vl | Vl/Vp |
| DHS Hurricane 301 | 89.6 | 1.88 | 1.64 | 0.87 | 1.20 | 1.29 | 1.08 |
| DHS Hurricane 301T | 90.7 | 2.05 | 1.87 | 0.91 | 1.28 | 1.23 | 0.96 |
| DHS Hurricane 301X | 89.9 | 1.98 | 1.86 | 0.94 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 0.99 |
| DHS Hurricane 301Z | 88.2 | 1.64 | 1.36 | 0.83 | 1.11 | 1.24 | 1.12 |
| DHS Hurricane Long 5 (2022) | 88.1 | 1.68 | 1.50 | 0.89 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.09 |
| DHS Hurricane Long 5 (2018) | 88.2 | 1.64 | 1.24 | 0.76 | 1.06 | 1.27 | 1.20 |
| DHS Hurricane Long 5X | 89.0 | 1.86 | 1.54 | 0.83 | 1.20 | 1.37 | 1.14 |
| Donic Anders Lind HexaCarbon | 86.5 | 2.04 | 1.88 | 0.92 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.05 |
| Donic Li Ping KiTex | 85.4 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.01 | 1.29 | 1.20 | 0.93 |
| Donic Original No.1 | 88.7 | 1.75 | 1.44 | 0.82 | 1.14 | 1.31 | 1.15 |
| Donic Waldner Senso Carbon | 84.1 | 1.34 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 1.21 | 1.09 |
| Donic Whiper Inner Carbon | 85.2 | 1.75 | 1.81 | 1.04 | 1.30 | 1.20 | 0.93 |
| Joola Rosskopf Allround | 91.0 | 1.80 | 1.38 | 0.77 | 1.09 | 1.22 | 1.12 |
| Joola Rosskopf Emotion | 79.2 | 1.44 | 1.39 | 0.96 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.00 |
| Joola TPE Fight | 85.0 | 2.19 | 2.42 | 1.11 | 1.51 | 1.38 | 0.91 |
Joola / 3+2 ply
| Name | Avg.Wt (g) | Ep | Ec | Ec/Ep | Vp | Vl | Vl/Vp |
| Joola Aruna OFF+ | 90.7 | 2.09 | 4.11 | 1.97 | 1.86 | 0.92 | 0.49 |
| Joola Rosskopf Force | 91.7 | 2.15 | 3.61 | 1.68 | 1.77 | 0.96 | 0.54 |
DHS & Donic & Joola / 7-ply wood
| Name | Avg.Wt (g) | Ep | Ec | Ec/Ep | Vp | Vl | Vl/Vp |
| DHS Fang Bo B (7-ply) | 88.4 | 1.69 | 1.42 | 0.84 | 1.14 | 1.29 | 1.13 |
| DHS Hurricane Long 3 | 86.9 | 1.56 | 1.34 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.13 |
| Donic Persson PowerPlay | 83.9 | 1.31 | 1.25 | 0.95 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 0.98 |
| Donic Ovtcharov Senso V1 | 90.0 | 1.91 | 1.58 | 0.83 | 1.20 | 1.36 | 1.13 |
| Joola Falcon Fast+ | 85.6 | 1.82 | 1.47 | 0.81 | 1.17 | 1.36 | 1.17 |
| Joola TPE Nature | 86.2 | 1.79 | 1.71 | 0.96 | 1.25 | 1.14 | 0.91 |
DHS & Donic & Joola / 5-ply wood
| Name | Avg.Wt (g) | Ep | Ec | Ec/Ep | Vp | Vl | Vl/Vp |
| DHS Hurricane King | 88.9 | 1.55 | 1.44 | 0.93 | 1.17 | 1.21 | 1.03 |
| DHS Hurricane King 2 | 85.8 | 1.65 | 1.52 | 0.92 | 1.19 | 1.30 | 1.09 |
| Donic Walnder Dicon | 85.3 | 1.42 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 0.96 | 1.21 | 1.26 |
| Joola Flame Fast | 86.1 | 1.76 | 1.66 | 0.94 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 1.03 |
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this website’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to TTGearLab with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
TTGearLab 
Hello. I am a fan of your work and would like to place an request. Could you please review some of the heat treated blades? Like the Donic Burn series, for which I would like to know the Ec/Ep values.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have some heat treated blades, but those are not currently available models. Regarding Burn series, I’m considering to contact Donic distributor. But, I’m not sure I will be able to get samples soon. (I once visited the exibition of Donic Distributor but I couldn’t see Burn series there.)
LikeLike
Can you also review some donics “Waldner Legend Carbon”, “Original Carbospeed”, “Original True Carbon Inner” at least elasticity and vibration values. Many members in my club use this blade. And thanks for all useful reviews on this blog.
LikeLike
Thank you for comment. But, I don’t have the samples of the blades you mentioned.
I’m considering to contact Donic distributor for getting samples. If it is realized I will be able to deal with more Donic blades in this web site. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
How can you compare Donic Waldner Senso Carbon vs Donic Walnder Dicon? Donic’s catalog says that Dicon is faster (9+) and with less control (7+) compares to Waldner Senso Carbon (8+ and 8+). Also Dicon described like “nearly stiff” with OFF-…OFF rating. And Waldner Senso Carbon described like “speed elastic” with AR+…OFF rating.From yours indexes we can see completely different natures for that two blades. So which blade from this two is easier to play for beginner player and why?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please first check Ep, Ec and Ec/Ep of those two models.
DICON : 1.42 / 0.97 / 0.68
SENSO CARBON : 1.39 / 1.28 / 0.92
Both of those two will be very good for beginners because the elasticity level is not high. Both of those will provide very good control. Although there are differeces between two, thinking better or worse will not be much meaningful in my opinion.
But, becasue of very low Ec/Ep (= 0.68), Dicon will be better for extremely aggressive topspin that aims at rising of ball. On ther contrary, because of much higher Ec/Ep (= 0.92), Senso Carbon will be better for all-round play which uses various technics.
Then, if we consider the fact that beginners don’t have style and they have to learn various technics, Senso Carbon will be better choice.
LikeLike
Also I want to say that I have good results with Waldner Senso Carbon (JO Shape) and I like that blade a lot. But now I switched to the light sample of Xiom Fuga (81 grams blade but with slightly different rubbers). I also real enjoy to play with such combo and feel slightly more safe with it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for using Fuga!
LikeLike
Could you make a report on Hurricane HAO 3 and Power G13??
LikeLike