Work of TTGearLab :
(1) The concept of blade family
(2) Designing the constructions of plywoods (using performance indices)
(3) Designing the head shape and handle shape
(4) Graphic design – Handle wood blocks, lenses and head printings
ITC is a brand established in 2015 by one of adidas distributors. Because it had been expected that adidas may quit table tennis market in near future, the distributor started to establish its own table tennis brand, and prepared for new blades and rubbers. Premier series is the first blade family announced in late 2015 after adidas quit table tennis market.
ReDATT managed all the process of the development of ITC blades. Four very unique constuctions were finally selected as the first blades, and were launched as ‘Premier’ series. Three among four were inner-fiber blades, and the other was a 5-ply wood blade.

The four blades of Premiere series are the first blades those have the graph of ‘common ratings’ provided by TTGearLab. Because original performance indices are not that intuitive, and may be difficult for customers, TTGearLab modified the indices to common ratings those are more intuitive and more understandable. The graphs of common ratings were printied on the backhand side of Premiere series. And, the same concept of graphic were applied for all ITC blades those were developed by TTGearLab.

Premier XR was developed as a blade to represent ITC. It is a 5+2 ply inner fiber blade, but it is thicker than common inner-fiber blades at that time. Eche was selected as the top layer of this blade to realize a high-class appearance and high performance at the same time. The fiber of Premier XR is the same one as that for adidas Hypertouch and RadiX series. (adidas called it as RX-Carbon. And ITC called it as RedFlex Carbon) Thanks to hard top layer and thicker construction, Premier XR was much faster than standard inner-ALC blades, and was as fast as representative outer-fiber blades at that time.

Premier XF is the slower version of Premier XR. Its construction was based on that of Premier XR. But, instead of RX-Carbon, the Texalium fiber that was the same fiber as the one used for adidas ProTex series were selected as the fiber for Premier XF. (ITC called it as BlueFlex fiber while adidas called it as BlueTex fiber.) Premier XF is slower and softer than Premier XR. But, it provided better ability of control.

Premier XC is also an inner-fiber blade. But, its top layer is Hinoki and its fiber is woven carbon fiber. So it could be considered as a kind of ‘Hinoki-Carbon’ blade. However, Premier XC provided the ability of holding ball deeper than most of common Hinoki-Carbon blades whose construction is 3+2 ply, while providing the same level of speed.

Premier XQ is a 5-ply wood blade with Hinoki top layer. It was considered as the lower speed / lower cost version of Premier XC. Among fiver layers of its construction, four layers (= top layers and middle layers) are Hinoki. To reduce the weight while keeping relatively thick construction, different wood was used for the center layer. Although Premier XQ was slower than Premier XC, it was a very fast blade as an 5-ply wood blade. It was even more elastic than more expensive Premier XF.
Following are the performance indices of Premier series :
Premier XR
– Ep = 1.97
– Ec = 1.93 (Ec/Ep = 0.98)
– Vp = 1.36
– Vl = 1.32 (Vl/Vp = 0.97)
Premier XF
– Ep = 1.74
– Ec = 1.40 (Ec/Ep = 0.81)
– Vp = 1.11
– Vl = 1.22 (Vl/Vp = 1.09)
Premier XC
– Ep = 2.93
– Ec = 2.51 (Ec/Ep = 0.86)
– Vp = 1.47
– Vl = 1.56 (Vl/Vp = 1.06)
Premier XQ
– Ep = 1.85
– Ec = 1.95 (Ec/Ep = 1.06)
– Vp = 1.34
– Vl = 1.13 (Vl/Vp = 0.84)
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this website’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to TTGearLab with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Hello,
I saw that you were involved in the design of this handle of the ITC Premier XR/XF? Is that correct? Do you know what other blades have the same handle size/design? As I am trying different blades and after using this one, the other blades seem to be too small or uncomfortable. I feel like it might be because the top part of the handle is larger or the slanted part where the thumb goes is deeper than other blades.
Thanks
LikeLike
Thank you a lot for comment.
I did everything from engineering and graphic design of Premier series – XR, XF, XC and XQ. 🙂 (So I’m not just ‘involved in’ the design of Premier series.)
The overall size of the handle of Premier series isn’t much different from the size of other handles. But, there are differences in the size of details. There had been ‘ideal shape’ I had thought, and I applied it to the handle shape of Premier series. So probably you felt that it is extremely stable and comfortable. 🙂
The problem is that it is a unique handle shape, and you will not be able to find same shape in the market.
If you mean FL handle and you can find the ‘Legend’ handle type of Stiga blade, please try it once. It is different from the handle of ITC Premier series, but there are similarities in the angle and size of thumb part. (But, I’m not sure whether you will be able to find or not because ‘Legend’ handle of Stiga blade isn’t produced any more, and currently only ‘Master’ handle is available as the FL handle of Stiga.)
I’m seriously considering to apply the handle shape of Premier series when I make ‘TTGearLab 25 years anniversary’ blade.
LikeLike
Do you know ITC Athena Platinum?
LikeLike
It isn’t developed by me. So I don’t have detailed information on it.
LikeLike
Hello! I’ve noticed that there are two versions of the XR blade, one is a regular wood like the one in the image you provided, and the other is a shape that resembles zebra wood. Can you tell me the difference between them and which one is more suitable for me? I currently like nexy’s external fiber blades and want to get enough sensitivity and directivity as well as enough speed and rotation, and I’ve heard that the XR will meet my needs
LikeLike
Ummmm ……. There isn’t variation of ITC Premier XR. The difference in wood grain patterns are simply the deviation by piece of wood. Even though the appearances look somewhat differet, the top layer is same ‘Ash’.
LikeLike
Hello,
I want to ask about the difference between ITC Premier XC with KTS Hinoki Maxx and Primorac Carbon? Can you give me recommendation if my playing style use chinese rubber in forehand love to play loop and spin what should i choose ITC Premier XC or KTS Hinoki Maxx? Thank You
LikeLike
Hinoki Maxx and Primorac Carbon are hinoki carbon blades with thick 3+2 ply construction. But, Premier XC is relatively thinner blade with 5+2 inner construction. Although there are similarities in playing characteristics, there is clear difference due to thickness.
But, nothing between those two is suitable for your rubbers. If you want to select one among KTS blades, I recommend Foundation GF.K (in case you lay emphasis on control) or Forge 3K (in case you lay emphasis on power). Those are ‘non-hinoki’ blades with even thinner constructions, and are suitable for using Chinese sticky rubbers.
LikeLike