‘Fang Bo’ series (or ‘Bo’ series) is named after Fang Bo whos is the member of Chinese Men’s Nationa Team. The blades in this series are provided in lower cost than the blade whose name includes ‘Hurricane’. (Some people are calling this series as ‘Hurricane Bo’ series.) ‘Fang Bo’ series which boasts excellent cost-performance includes one type of pure wood blade and two types of fiber blades. Among those three, the pure wood blade is ‘Fang Bo B’ which is a 7-ply wood blade. It is called also as ‘Bo 7-ply’, ‘Fang Bo B’ or ‘Fang Bo 7-ply’. Unlike two fiber blades called ‘Fang Bo B2’ and ‘Fang Bo B2X’ are lower cost version of ‘Hurricane Long 5’ and ‘Hurricane Long 5X’, ‘Fang Bo B’ has a unique 7-ply wood construction. Although it is a seven ply wood blade, it doesn’t fit for fast attack but for modern topspin. ‘Fang Bo’ can especially be recommended for players who want to replace their 5-ply wood offensive blade with more powerful blade but don’t like the feeling of fiber blade.
‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’ is the ‘Fang Bo’ series. At the beginning, it was a single model, and there wasn’t a blade family with the name ‘Fang Bo’. Afterwards as the ALC version appeared, the existing 7-ply wood version came to be called ‘Fang Bo B’, and the new fiber blade came to be called ‘Fang Bo B2’.
Although ‘Fang Bo B’ is a 7-ply wood blade, its construction doesn’t follow the classic 7-ply wood construction of ‘Clipper’ type. The layer under its middle layer isn’t thick like that of classic construction. Instead it has additional thin layer between the middle layer and the center layer.
The shakehand handle of ‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’ is available only in FL (flared) type. The width of FL (flared) handle is around 25mm (at head side) ~ 26mm (at bulge and at the middle of handle) ~ 35mm (at the end), and the thickness of FL handle is round 21.5mm (at thumb) ~ 25.5mm (at the end). The length is around 101mm. FL handle is quite slim at the middle of handle but not slim at the end. That is one of common characteristics of the FL handle of DHS.
The rounded lens at the end of handle shows the picture of Fang Bo.
Printing isn’t applied at the backside of head, like the foreside. However, at the backside of handle, there is the lens whose shape is same as that of the lens at foreside of handle.
Foreside lens shows the logo of DHS, and the backside lens shows logo ‘博(Bo)’. Under the Bo logo in backside lens it is written as ‘纯木(pure wood)’.
The head size is around 158mm x 150mm.
Left if ‘Fang Bo B2 (ALC)’ which is an inner ALC blade, and right is ‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’. The graphic design of those two basically identical to each other, and we can distinguish those two only by the kind of top layer woods when we can see only the foresides of those two blades. Another model which isn’t shown in this picture is ‘Fang Bo B2X’, and it can be easily distinguished by the point color in the handle. The point color of ‘Fang Bo B2X’ isn’t light blue but light gray.
Left if the backside lens of ‘Fang Bo B2 (ALC)’ which is an inner ALC blade, and right is the backside lens ‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’. It is written as ‘芳碳(ALC)’ in the backside lens of ‘Fang Bo B2 (ALC)’, and as ‘纯木(pure wood)’ in the backside lens of ‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’.
‘Fang Bo’ series is a blade family that provides high performance and high quality of ‘Hurricane’ series in much lower cost. Especially its seven ply wood version – ‘Fang Bo B (7-ply)’ – can be considered as one of the representative 7-ply blades in this age, and can be recommended for the players who like pure wood blades.
Following are the performance indices of Fang Bo B (7-ply) (avg.weight = 88.4g) :
– Ep = 1.69
– Ec = 1.42 (Ec/Ep = 0.84)
– Vp = 1.14
– Vl = 1.29 (Vl/Vp = 1.13)
Please note that above are average values and can be updated by further measurement.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this website’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to TTGearLab with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Thanks for another userful data!
Have you ever measured indecies for “Sanwei Fextra 7” 7-ply wood blade?
I wish for all of us a lot of reviews and datas in New 2024 Year!!
LikeLike
Thank you a lot for comment. Good to hear that the data has been helpful for you.
Regarding the blade, I haven’t measured San-wei blades yet. It is somewhat difficult to buy San-wei blades here. But, I will also consider it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Curious about Fangbo B2‘s data, it seems the weavimg method looks like former HL5. And the HL5’s price is more than 3 times higher than B2.
LikeLike
DHS PG5 for me also looks like former HL5.
LikeLike
Also right. But, its quality is lower, and the deviation of performance is much bigger. Some pcs. feel quite different from the former HL5.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right! The Fang Bo B2 in the picture is the one of some years ago, and its fiber is same as that of former HL5. But, I haven’t checked yet whether Fang Bo B2 has also been updated or not. I couldn’t have got recent one of Fang Bo B2.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I bought the latest HL5 with white card and latest B2, the weaving methods are extremely same after comparation. The only difference is HL5’s handle is 1mm rounder.
LikeLike
Thank you a lot for information. Now it is clear that B2 was also updated together with HL5.
Then the parameters of B2 (avg. values) will be same as the parameters of HL5 if we can ignore the difference by handle.
LikeLike
Another doubt, I found the latest HL5X and B2X’s weaving methods seem like updated too, have you heard of this? I’m not quite sure, but the recent picture looks different from your HL5X blog.
LikeLike
I have had the same doubt so far. If those two are also updated, I need to check the new characteristics of those two blades. (Probably identical with each other, but different from old ones.)
LikeLike
Great analysis, the all wood Bo has always been over looked, which tends to be the case when comparing 7ply blades to fiber ones (except for flagship models like pg7, clipper, samsonov pro black). It would be interesting see a comparison in performance between the Fang B2 and B2x with the Long 5 and 5x, because other than the handle and nicer finish it is hard to spot other difference besides the price
LikeLike
Thank you for comment. In fact I couldn’t have found any difference between Fang Bo B2 and Hurricane Long 5 before the replacement of fiber. And, also I couldn’t have found difference between Fang Bo B2X and Hurricane Long 5X. But, I don’t know yet whether the fibers of B2, B2X and HL5X have also been replaced or not.
I think that basically the difference between B and HL5 is the quality of plywood. (But, B is also very good.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi,did ttgearlab do the measurment on FangBo b2 b2x and the data is similar to HL5 and HL5X?
LikeLike
Yes. I couldn’t find meaningful difference between B2 and HL5. And between B2X and HL5X when I measured those blades some years ago. However, I don’t know whether B2 and B2X has also been renewed.
LikeLike
The Fang Bo family has grown with the addition of Fang Bo Carbon (outer ALC). Would be great to read your finding on this blade.
LikeLike
If possible I will get that blade and measure it. I think that it will not be difficult.
LikeLike
I am also curious about measurements of recent version of Fang Bo B2. I compare it to DHS 301Z. Thickness of both blades about 6 mm (with protective plastic film). Bounce test: 301Z is slower than Fang Bo B2. Frequency: DHS 301Z 1290 Hz, Fang Bo B2 1300 Hz. Fang Bo B2 is stiffer (less bend) than 301Z. Weight: 301Z 89 grams, Fang Bo B2 92 grams. Blade and handle looks the same. That is my subjective impressions and not perfect measurements.
Some reviewers are claimed that Long 5 is faster than Fang Bo B2. So your measurements would help us a lot 🙂
LikeLike
I don’t have the recent version of B2. But, if its fiber has also been changed, it will be almost same as new HL5. Then what you felt is concerned with the central deformation. (But, we can’t determine the stiffness just by the frequency. The other factors should be concerned for the calculation of stiffness.) There isn’t noticeable difference between the primary (= bending) stiffness of HL5 and that of H301Z. But, the difference in the central stiffness is significant. At the center of head, H301Z is much more flexible than HL5 which is assumed to be almost same as new B2.
That will be the main reason why you felt as you mentioned. And, your subjective impressions coincide with the objective measurement. 🙂
In fact, the start point of my research is to find the way for objectively explaining our subjective impressions.
LikeLike